NRA Posts Misrepresent Harris’ Position on Gun Ownership

Throughout the 2020 presidential race, then-Sen. Kamala Harris came out in support of an obligatory buyback program for supposed assault weapons. At a weapon security online forum in Las vega, Harris said, “we have to have a buyback program, and I sustain a required buyback program.”

As the present Democratic nominee for head of state, Harris continues to sustain a ban on acquiring specific semiautomatic tools. Her project told us she is no much longer promoting that Americans be needed to give up weapons that they had actually lawfully purchased.

When asked for comment concerning the insurance claim that Harris wants to “outlaw honest Americans from owning” weapons, an NRA agent guided us to a current post on X by Harris’ main vice governmental account that reads, “Congress has to restore the assault weapons ban.”

At a gun safety online forum in Las Vegas, Harris claimed, “we have to have a buyback program, and I support a necessary buyback program.”

At a Sept. 19 campaign occasion with former talk program host Oprah Winfrey, Harris told households of institution shooting targets that “for far also long on the issue of gun violence, some people have been pressing a truly false choice to suggest you’re either for the 2nd Amendment or you want to take everybody’s weapons away. I favor the 2nd Change, and I’m in favor of attack weapons outlaws, universal history checks, warning laws, and these are just sound judgment.”

Harris was questioned regarding her plan adjustments on guns and other problems throughout the Sept. 10 argument with previous President Donald Trump. She stated that her “values have not transformed,” however did not comment even more especially on her position. Later in the discussion, Harris claimed, “We’re not taking anyone’s weapons away.”

A Sept. 17 Instagram message by the National Rifle Association wrongly claims, “All Kamala Harris knows concerning weapons is that she desires to prohibit them.” In the video clip, Harris can be heard requiring global background checks and shutting the so-called gun-show technicality that enables unlicensed individuals to market guns without performing background checks.

Yet the cases misrepresent the vice president’s setting on weapons. While Harris sustains a restriction on so-called attack weapons, her strategy would certainly not apply to such tools acquired prior to the proposed restriction would take effect. The united state had a similar ban in position for ten years, from 1994 to 2004, on the sale of specific semiautomatic weapons, as we have composed prior to.

Vice President Kamala Harris supports a restriction on the sale of supposed attack weapons, yet no much longer supports an obligatory buyback program for such weapons. Her proposal would not ban all guns or confiscate any type of weapons.

Vice Head of state Kamala Harris sustains a ban on the sale of supposed assault tools, yet no longer supports a required buyback program for such weapons. The National Rifle Organization misleadingly declares that Harris will certainly “prohibit law-abiding Americans from having” weapons and “seize your legitimately had weapons.” Her proposal would not prohibit all guns or take any kind of guns.

Harris was questioned concerning her policy adjustments on weapons and various other issues throughout the Sept. 10 discussion with previous President Donald Trump.

A: Like all power resources, wind ranches have some adverse ecological effects. But obtaining power from wind farms results in drastically lower greenhouse gas exhausts than obtaining it from fossil fuels.

On the project path in 2019, Harris claimed that she had a weapon for “individual security.” Throughout the presidential dispute, she said, “Tim Walz and I are both weapon proprietors.” And she told Winfrey, “If somebody breaks in my residence, they’re getting shot.”