MPs cannot claim £50 in expenses for breakfast

A range of food and drink alternatives, consisting of morning meal, are offered at venues throughout the Residences of Parliament. These solutions are not directly subsidised, some of the venues run at a loss, indicating that public money is successfully spent subsidising the total food catering operation. The dining establishments are readily available to team, site visitors and passholders to Parliament as well as MPs.

Cases for food and non-alcoholic drinks are restricted to ₤ 25 per evening invested away and this covers all the meals they may have throughout this moment. This means that while an MP might theoretically spend all ₤ 25 on morning meal, they would certainly after that not be able to case expenses for any other dishes that day.

A variety of food and drink options, including morning meal, are readily available at locations throughout your houses of Parliament. Although these services are not directly subsidised, a few of the places run at a loss, meaning that public money is effectively invested subsidising the overall catering operation. Nonetheless, the dining establishments are readily available to personnel, passholders and site visitors to Parliament as well as MPs.

One post on Facebook includes message which checks out: “No British person needs to have to utilize a foodbank as long as an MP can assert ₤ 50 expenses for a Breakfast!” Various other blog posts on the site make the very same basic claim but using various wording, as do postson X (formerly Twitter).

While MPs can claim some money for food, this is only if they invest a night away from either their constituency or London for parliamentary organization, and they’re just enabled to claim ₤ 25 per night they invest away.

In 2013 it arised that Sir Iain Duncan Smith MP, that was acting as work and pensions assistant at the time, had an expenses claim that included a morning meal costing ₤ 39 denied, though the specific reasons do not appear to have actually been made public.

Under guidelines established by IPSA, MPs are just able to assert subsistence (food and non-alcoholic drinks) costs if they travel for legislative company and need to stay overnight at a location that is neither their constituency nor London. They have to give proof of the expenses sustained.

MPs who stand for constituencies in the London area or occupy “grace and favour” lodging in the funding are not qualified for lodging prices (however may be eligible to declare hotel prices if remaining over night on legislative business outside the London area).

This write-up becomes part of our job fact inspecting potentially incorrect photos, videos and tales on Facebook. You can find out more about this– and learn how to report Facebook web content– below.
For the purposes of that system, we’ve rated this claim as incorrect
because MPs can claim as much as ₤ 25 a day for food and non-alcoholic drinks, but only if they spend a night away from their constituency or London on legislative service.