Political Violence in America: Right vs. Left Extremism Trends

Analysis of political violence in the U.S. shows trends in both right and left-wing extremism. Data suggests a complex landscape, with violence spanning the ideological spectrum. Counterterrorism requires addressing both sides.

CSIS did not find– as some in the Trump administration have actually asserted lately– that political violence can be stemmed by focusing on left-leaning groups. In a video clip message on the day Kirk was shot and killed, Trump criticized Kirk’s death on “radical left” rhetoric and provided incidents he connected to “extreme left political physical violence,” not discussing recent physical violence targeting Democrats. And the head of state’s boy Donald Trump Jr. told Fox News’ Sean Hannity on Sept. 11: “The violence only goes one way. The institute said that political physical violence is “rare” and that there have been 79 people eliminated in politically encouraged terrorist attacks because 2020.

Trump’s Claims on Left-Wing Violence

“The surge in left-wing strikes benefits increased focus, but the loss in conservative assaults is most likely momentary, and it as well requires a government reaction,” the CSIS writers wrote. “In any kind of situation, many of the prescriptions for combating terrorism properly use to physical violence from both the left and. These consist of guaranteeing proper counterterrorism resourcing, avoiding overreactions, and having management unequivocally condemn such strikes.”

A research published in 2022 in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences looked at data from the 70 years between 1948 and 2018 and determined political physical violence committed by about 1,500 individuals– regarding 90% of whom were male. The research study “found that among radicalized individuals in the USA, those adhering to a left-wing ideology were considerably much less most likely to participate in terrible ideologically motivated acts when contrasted to conservative people.”

Research Findings on Radicalization

And the president’s son Donald Trump Jr. told Fox Information’ Sean Hannity on Sept. 11: “The violence just goes one means. We have seen that now, whether it’s the murder tries on my daddy’s life, whether it’s Charlie Kirk, whether it’s the harmful of a Supreme Court justice or doxing ICE representatives, that goes one method.

The next day, he signed an executive order marking the anti-fascist motion antifa a residential terror organization, something he also attempted throughout his first administration, although there is no such classification in united state law. Then on Sept. 25, Trump released a memorandum routing government firms to punish “Domestic Terrorism and Organized Political Physical Violence.” At the signing occasion, Stephen Miller, White House replacement chief of team for policy, explained it as “an all of federal government effort to take apart left-wing terrorism.”

One of the most recent information comes from the CSIS brief, which measured residential “terrorist attacks and stories” initially of 2025 via July 4, when an armed team attacked an ICE center in Alvarado, Texas. It discovered that there had actually been a high decline in conservative events (there was one in that period, which killed two people) and a boost in left-wing cases (there were 5 because amount of time, which killed no one). The data did not consist of Kirk’s fatality.

CSIS Data on Terrorist Attacks

Along with those instances of physical violence aimed at conventional numbers, there have, naturally, been numerous top-level examples of political violence against prominent Democrats in recent years. They include the June killing of Minnesota Home Speaker Melissa Hortman and her spouse and the capturing of Minnesota state Sen. John Hoffman and his other half; the April arson at the home of Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro; the 2022 burglary at after that Home Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s home that finished with her husband being attacked with a hammer; and the 2020 plot to abduct Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer.

Examples of Political Violence

In a video clip message on the day Kirk was shot and eliminated, Trump condemned Kirk’s death on “extreme left” rhetoric and noted cases he credited to “extreme left political physical violence,” not discussing current physical violence targeting Democrats. In a Fox News interview 2 days later on, Trump said, “The radicals on the right, usually are radical because they don’t want to see crime. … The radicals on the left are the problem.”

At the same time, “attacks from right-wing criminals have greatly decreased in 2025. This decline stands out, and descriptions are speculative. One opportunity is that many typical complaints that fierce conservative extremists have actually embraced in the past– opposition to abortion, hostility to immigration, and uncertainties of federal government firms, among others– are currently accepted by Head of state Trump and his administration.”

The CSIS analysis specifies “left-wing terrorism” as physical violence “encouraged by a resistance to colonialism, imperialism, or capitalism; black nationalism; support for LGBTQ+ legal rights; support for environmental causes or pet legal rights; adherence to pro-communist, pro-socialist beliefs or ‘anti-fascist’ rhetoric”; in addition to a belief that federal government causes social oppressions and assistance for anarchism or “partial extremism.” The term “conservative terrorism” refer to violence “encouraged by ideas of ethnic or racial supremacy; resistance to federal government authority, believing it is tyrannical and invalid; misogyny, consisting of incels; disgust based on sexuality or sex identity; belief in the QAnon conspiracy concept; opposition to abortion; or partisan extremism.”

Defining Left-Wing and Right-Wing Terrorism

Roudabeh Kishi, primary study police officer at Princeton’s Bridging Splits Effort, which tracks political physical violence, told us that it’s tough to say whether or not there’s been a rise in political physical violence in 2025. She didn’t have accessibility to existing data for the year. However, she claimed, “the Kirk shooting is a clear acceleration,” keeping in mind likewise that it adhered to the shootings of Minnesota state representatives and the murder effort against Trump in 2024.

Assessing the Rise in Violence

A 2024 National Institute of Justice record located that “the variety of reactionary strikes continues to surpass all other sorts of terrorism and domestic terrible extremism.” The Division of Justice got rid of that research study from its internet site on Sept. 12, according to pictures captured by the Internet Archive. When we asked why, a department spokeswoman did not comment.

“Undoubtedly, left-wing physical violence has actually climbed in the last ten years, specifically since President Donald Trump’s rise to political prestige in 2016, although it has actually climbed from very reduced levels and remains much lower than historical degrees of violence performed by jihadist and conservative enemies,” the report mentioned. “Even more contentious national politics in the USA and the expansion of the Make America Great Again (MAGA) movement show up to have actually reenergized terrible left-wing extremists.”

Researchers who study extremism and political violence use different criteria for gauging its prevalence– some include riots and the cops response to them, some procedure the ideology of the criminal, and others count the ideology of the target– so it’s hard to compare the findings. And there has actually been really little published research because Trump took office earlier this year.

The president additionally had said something similar in August, prior to Kirk was shot. On his social networks system, Fact Social, Trump claimed that Soros and his kid “should be billed with RICO due to their assistance of Fierce Protests, and far more, all throughout the USA of America.”

A: The number of transgender mass shooters in the united state varies relying on how “mass shooting” is defined, yet is reasonably tiny. The Gun Violence Archive, which uses a more comprehensive meaning, lists five mass shootings by transgender or nonbinary people given that January 2013. That’s less than 0.1% of the mass shootings it states happened in that period.

We depend on gives and private donations from people like you. If you choose to give by check, send out to: FactCheck.org, Annenberg Public Plan Facility, P.O. Box 58100, Philly, PA 19102.

Transgender Mass Shooters Statistics

Similarly, in 2020, CSIS reported that,” [ b] ased on a CSIS information set of terrorist cases, the most significant hazard likely originates from white supremacists, though anarchists and spiritual extremists inspired by the Islamic State and al-Qaeda could offer a potential threat also.”

According to an evaluation by the Center for Strategic and International Researches launched on Sept. 25, “In recent years, the USA has actually seen a boost in the variety of left-wing terrorism attacks and plots. … Up until now, 2025 marks the first time in greater than three decades that left-wing terrorist assaults surpass those from the fierce much right.”

In a Sept. 11 article, the libertarian Cato Institute found that, because 2020, conservative ideology has been the leading root cause of political murders, representing 54%. Left-wing ideology is 2nd, making up 22%, and Islamic ideological background is third, representing 21%. The institute claimed that political physical violence is “uncommon” which there have been 79 individuals eliminated in politically motivated terrorist strikes since 2020.

Information from the Prosecution Job, which magazines occurrences of political physical violence by the ideological affiliation that is established with court proceedings that led to a guilty decision, show that political physical violence in the last decade has actually been controlled by right-wing ideological background. The Economic expert utilized the job’s information to produce a graph on Sept. 12.

Threats Against Congress Members

In a statement at the time, the Open Society Foundations stated, “We do not pay people to objection or straight train or coordinate activists. All Open Society grantees are needed to follow the regulation and we expect our grantees to uphold our shared commitment to civils rights, dignity, and nonviolence. The Open Culture Foundations oppose all forms of physical violence, consisting of terrible objections.”

Hazards against participants of Congress are on the rise this year. U.S. Capitol Cops informed us” [o] ur representatives are on track to resolve roughly 14,000 Hazard Analysis Cases by the end of the 2025.” (For recommendation, the highest variety of yearly risk situations checked out by the Capitol Authorities had been 9,625 in 2021.).

“We’re mosting likely to check into Soros due to the fact that I think it’s a RICO instance against him,” Trump stated in an appearance on “Fox & Buddies” on Sept. 12, referring to George Soros, the billionaire benefactor who funds democratic causes with his Open Society Foundations and has been the subject of conspiracy theories and conservative stories targeted at lowering liberal teams for greater than a years. The government RICO law, or Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, targets arranged criminal ventures.

Roudabeh Kishi, chief research study police officer at Princeton’s Bridging Separates Campaign, which tracks political violence, told us that it’s hard to say whether or not there’s been a rise in political violence in 2025.

CSIS did not find– as some in the Trump administration have claimed recently– that political physical violence can be stemmed by concentrating on left-leaning groups. To the contrary, CSIS cautioned that “dealing with terrorism properly” calls for “counterterrorism initiatives against both right- and left-wing terrorism.” The analysis keeps in mind that the terms “left-wing” and “right-wing” terrorism “do not correspond to mainstream political parties in the United States … nor do they correspond to the overwhelming bulk of political liberals and traditionalists in the USA.”

“Although we don’t break down the numbers openly by party, Members of Congress of both political celebrations obtain a wide range of risks and concerning statements that are sent via the mail, e-mail, telephone, social media, and the web,” a Capitol Cops representative told us.

“The uptick in violence versus lawmakers is not constrained to just one event or one nation,” Home Speaker Mike Johnson kept in mind during an address at the G7 meeting on Sept. 5. “It’s a typical obstacle for everybody.”.

Congressionally mandatedreports from the FBI and the Department of Homeland Protection that have actually analyzed domestic terrorism since 2017 have saideveryyear, until now, that white supremacists have been one of the most deadly risk of residential fear. One of the most recent record was provided in 2023 and covered information from the prior year.

In the days adhering to the murder of conservative activist Charlie Kirk, Head Of State Donald Trump and others in his circle have represented political violence as a trouble specifically or primarily on the left, which has after that been made use of as justification for proposals that look for to punish left-leaning groups. While there is evidence of a rise in left-wing physical violence over the last few years, information reveal that political physical violence in America spans the ideological spectrum.